In this paper, we join with leader in the field Tony Morris to outline the psychology of fear commonly experienced by executives in psychosocial risk management, along with its typical outcomes and costs.
We also provide practical guidance for leaders to proactively engage in a rigorous psychosocial risk management process, not only to meet regulatory obligations but to foster a safer, healthier, and more productive workforce.
Reports and Guides
26/08/25
Our Mibo Psychosocial Risk Management Assessement (PRMA) developed for rigour, balance, and accuracy…has been independently evaluated by the Griffith University RISE Research Centre and found to be a very high‑quality instrument, praised for its strong validity and reliability. Here’s the overview:
LEARN MORE
Videos
21/08/25
Popular quantitative psychosocial risk assessment approaches tend to overlook crucial truths about the psychosocial environment. In this brief video walkthrough, I summarise 3 requirements for next generation quantitative psychosocial risk management: 1. Assessing risk based on prevalence x impact2. Measuring harm and benefit, and3. Analysing individual variation I hope you find it helpful 😊
LEARN MORE
Reports and Guides
29/06/25
Hazard ID surveys were instrumental in shifting the field toward the inclusion of quantitative approaches in psychosocial risk management And while more recent 2nd generation risk assessment tools rooted in the Occupational Hygiene Model were an important step forward, they’re not suitably equipped for the complexities of the psychosocial environment. To advance the field it’s […]
LEARN MORE